loading

Chapter 1: Who is there to halt nuclear reactors? Reality of the ‘Fukushima 50’

japanese 日本語版
scroll

In our coverage titled “The Yoshida Testimony,” reporting to the effect that workers withdrew from the Fukushima No.1 nuclear power plant against the general manager's order was erroneous. We deeply apologize to our readers and those at Tokyo Electric Power Co.
Based on the views presented by the Press and Human Rights Committee, we have made revisions to the relevant parts in Chapter 1’s first section, titled “Reality of the ‘Fukushima 50.’” (Dec. 3, 2014)
(Full texts are available.)

Photo: The central control room for the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant is affected by a plant-wide power blackout on March 23, 2011. (Provided by the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency)

Who is responsible for stopping a nuclear reactor that is spiraling out of control? Is that individual justified in taking flight when the reactor is finally about to burst?

Can local residents be evacuated properly under the direction of a prefectural governor, who has no way of finding out about the status of a nuclear reactor?

In the first place, are humans ever able to halt a nuclear reactor that has begun running amok?

Masao Yoshida, who served as general manager of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant during the triple meltdowns of March 2011, told about his actions and judgments for bringing the situation under control, sometimes with remorse, during the interviews with the government investigation panel.

Yoshida’s testimony is a convincing reminder of what a huge mistake it is to seek restarts of Japan’s nuclear reactors without trying to learn the truth of the disaster and making important decisions.

At around 6:15 a.m. on March 15, 2011, four days after the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami, a round table presided by Yoshida in an emergency response room on the second floor of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant’s quake-proof control center building heard two important reports, almost simultaneously, from front-line workers.

One said that pressure in the suppression chamber, or the lower part of the containment vessel for the No. 2 reactor, had vanished. The other said an explosive sound had been heard.

Question: Well, this is not necessarily in the No. 2 reactor, but sometime around 6 a.m. or 6:10 a.m. on March 15, pressure in the No. 2 reactor’s suppression chamber, for one thing, fell suddenly to zero. And around the same time, something ...

Yoshida: An explosive sound.

Q: A sound. Did you hear it or sense it in the quake-proof control center building? I mean, the shocks, or the sound.

Yoshida: They didn’t come to the quake-proof control center building. As I recall, Prime Minister (Naoto) Kan visited the head office (of Tokyo Electric Power Co., operator of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant) on that morning, so we had hooked up to the head office via a teleconferencing system. We had planned to stay in the quake-proof control center building to watch the teleconference, but the central operation--I don’t know if I just happened to be in the central operation at the time. Maybe you could ask the power generation team leader about it. I don’t remember--but anyway, reports arrived that the parameter had fallen to zero and that there had been this popping sound. (The reports arrived) at the headquarters’ seats in the quake-proof control center building. I first thought--well, pressure remained in the dry well at the time. The dry well pressure remained, and it would normally be improbable that pressure remains in the dry well but vanishes in the suppression chamber. But in the worst case, if the dry well pressure was totally unreliable, the zero pressure in the suppression chamber indicated the containment vessel could have been destroyed. So conservatively thinking, the containment vessel could have been damaged, and the popping sound could have represented a certain rupture, so, although confirmation was insufficient, I stood on that premise and decided that was an emergency, and I ordered workers to take shelter. I ordered that everybody except operation staff and main repair staff should take temporary shelter.

Photo: A teleconferencing system monitor, left background, hangs in the emergency response room in the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant’s quake-proof control center building on April 1, 2011. Sources said windows were covered with lead to keep radiation levels low in the room. (Provided by Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

Desperate efforts were going on at “1F”--insider slang for the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant--to keep its No. 2 reactor from going out of control. Conditions in the No. 2 reactor began to change sharply for the worse around noon on March 14.

There was, among others, a pressing need to curb a rise in pressure in the reactor containment vessel. Workers were eager to find a way to “vent,” or release gas from the interior of, the containment vessel to prevent it from bursting. They also wished to lower pressure in the pressure vessel and then use a fire engine to pump water into the reactor to cool nuclear fuel.

There was a report, slightly past 1 a.m. on March 15, that venting had succeeded and water had likely been pumped into the reactor. But another on-site report arrived only about two hours later, at 3:12 a.m., to deny that story.

“I guess no water has been pumped into the reactor,” said a shift supervisor who was overseeing operators at the “central operation,” or the central control room for the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors.

If a reactor receives no water, nuclear fuel inside could melt down from the intense heat it generates. If the situation is further left unattended, the fuel could penetrate the steel walls of the reactor pressure vessel, and then the thick steel walls of the containment vessel, and leak out into the living environment of humans.

——‘CONSERVATIVELY THINKING, THE CONTAINMENT VESSEL COULD HAVE BEEN DAMAGED’

The two important reports of the zero pressure and the explosive sound came at a time when such concerns were being raised. It was all too natural that those stories were taken to indicate that the No. 2 reactor’s containment vessel had possibly been destroyed.

A ruptured containment vessel would inevitably expose the 720 staff workers at the Fukushima No. 1 plant, at point-blank range, to large radiation doses. Thence came the talk of going to “2F”--the insider slang for the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear power plant.

At 6:21 a.m., operators in the central control rooms for the respective reactors at the plant were ordered to evacuate to the quake-proof control center building to minimize their radiation exposures.

At 6:22 a.m., all workers at the plant were ordered to wear charcoal masks containing active carbon to block oral and nasal inhalation of airborne radioactive substances.

At 6:27 a.m., the public address system began explaining procedures for taking shelter.

On-site data that arrived around that time denied that the No. 2 reactor’s containment vessel had been destroyed. It said radiation levels in the emergency response room in the quake-proof control center building, where Yoshida worked, remained relatively low at 15-20 microsieverts per hour.

Photo: Officials of TEPCO’s Fukushima Office explain to reporters about an explosive sound heard at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. The photo was taken in the Fukushima Prefecture Jichi Kaikan building in the prefectural capital of Fukushima at 8:09 a.m. on March 15, 2011. (Koichi Murakami)

Yoshida: Actually, I never told them to go to 2F. This is the typical stuff with relayed messages. We were discussing, “Should we head for 2F if we are ever going?” I said, “Take shelter, get automobiles.” And somebody who relayed my message told the drivers to go to the Fukushima No. 2 plant. I thought I was saying, “Take temporary shelter somewhere near the Fukushima No. 1 plant, where radiation levels are low despite its location on the plant site, and wait for the next instruction,” but I was told, “They have left for 2F,” so I thought, “Heck!” I said, “Tell them to let us know once they have arrived at 2F, and tell ‘Group Manager’ level workers (senior employees) to return in the first place.” That’s how the GM-level staff had to return in the first place.

Question: Really? So you had, in your mind, somewhere near 1F where radiation levels were low, like, for example, inside buses, right?

Yoshida: We had this No. 2 reactor, and the No. 2 reactor was in the most perilous state. I mean, radioactivity, radiation levels. The quake-proof control center building stands very close to it. So I thought I was saying, “Get out of here and take temporary shelter to the south or to the north, wherever radiation levels remain stable.” But if you come to think about it, everybody was wearing a full-face mask. So if you take shelter like that for hours, you’ll be dead. I came to believe that going to 2F was by far the right thing to do if only you gave more thought to it. Anyway, I think they went to 2F, took off their masks, and did whatnot, with their masks off.

Q: You called back the GM-level staff in the first place, and people gradually came back after that. Did you say, “Mr. so-and-so, I feel bad for you, but could you come back, please?”

Yoshida: Radiation levels had risen, but not so terribly. So I told the team leaders, “If there is anybody in your respective team who could work or could back us up, please send him back to us.”

Photo: White smoke spews from the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant’s No. 2 reactor building on the morning of March 15, 2011. This photo was released on Feb. 1, 2013. (Provided by Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

At 6:30 a.m., Yoshida spoke into a microphone of the teleconferencing system, “We will confirm parameters after having workers take temporary shelter,” where “parameters” referred to measurement instrument readings.

Two minutes later, TEPCO President Masataka Shimizu ordered everybody except for minimum staff to take shelter. Only an hour earlier, Shimizu had been dressed down by Kan, who visited TEPCO’s head office in person and said, “TEPCO would no longer exist if you were to withdraw (from the disaster site).”

At 6:33 a.m., Yoshida, at Shimizu’s behest, told team leaders who were in the emergency response room to present the names of their team members who should stay.

At 6:34 a.m., an announcement said radiation levels in the emergency response room remained unchanged.

The residual pressure in the dry well, the upper portion of the containment vessel, is clearly at odds with the story that the containment vessel had been ruptured. And in the first place, radiation levels in the emergency response room had not risen at all.

Yoshida issued an ordergave instructions at 6:42 a.m.

“Take shelter in areas of low radiation levels on the plant premises,” the orderhe said. “I will have you return if the headquarters later confirms that nothing is abnormal.”

The containment vessel was likely not destroyed, but on-site radiation levels should be measured, just in case. Everybody except for minimum staff who will stay should be put on standby, until safety is confirmed, in areas of low radiation levels on the grounds of the Fukushima No. 1 plant. The workers should return and resume their duties as soon as safety has been confirmed--so went Yoshida’s judgment and order.

Photo: Officials are busy at the Fukushima prefectural government’s disaster response headquarters in the prefectural capital of Fukushima at 8:35 a.m. on March 15, 2011, following reports of an explosive sound at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. (Yoshinori Mizuno)

The radiation levels were measured. They stood at 5 millisieverts per hour as of 7:14 a.m. near the quake-proof control center building, almost unchanged from slightly past 2 p.m. on March 13, when the No. 3 reactor building had not yet exploded. That indicates Yoshida’s instructions to gave the right instruction when he ordered workers to take shelter nearbywere the right ones.

Around the same time, however, 650 workers, who had gotten into buses in front of the quake-proof control center building, were heading, against Yoshida’s orderapart from Yoshida’s instructions, for the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant, 10 km to the south, instead of areas of low radiation levels near the Fukushima No. 1 plant. Those workers included some of the GM-level staff, or senior employees on the level of division managers and section chiefs.

Yoshida was shocked to learn that some, though not all, of his GM-level staff had left for the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant.

Photo: Officials are busy at the Fukushima prefectural government’s disaster response headquarters in the prefectural capital of Fukushima at 8:35 a.m. on March 15, 2011, following reports of an explosive sound at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. (Yoshinori Mizuno)

Yoshida: Some 20-30 minutes later, somebody came back from the No. 4 reactor and said, “The No. 4 reactor building is in shambles.” “What’s that?” we asked, and we sent people to take photographs, and there it was, totally out of shape. The shift supervisor--who was it? Well, Saito--so Saito, the shift supervisor, was the first to return. I asked him, “How’s everything?” and he said, “There was a blast.” I asked him things like, “Did the blast occur when you were in the service building for the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors?” So he sensed that blast, and he was entering or leaving (the building). Anyway, he looked on his way back and saw the No. 4 reactor building in shambles. I don’t remember if things were the same for Tomita and Saito, but when I talked to Tomita and Saito later, they said the moment they sensed the blasting wind almost coincided with the time the No. 2 reactor’s suppression chamber (pressure) vanished, so then I thought, it was difficult to tell which one (of the No. 2 and No. 4 reactors) was to blame. But the zero suppression chamber (pressure) in the No. 2 reactor meant it was in a really perilous state. If it had been broken, it would leak radioactive substances, and the situation would become really dangerous, so I decided anybody who could evacuate should be allowed to take maximum shelter.

Photo: Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Tetsuro Fukuyama, right, advises Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano at the prime minister’s office during a news conference at 11:26 a.m. on March 15, 2011.

TEPCO has so far given explanations that could be taken to imply that the massive staff defection totaking of shelter at the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant took place as planned. The utility has said it presumed that necessary staff should be left on the site to continue dealing with the crisis.

Foreign media outlets praised the dozens who remained on the site, whom they called the “Fukushima 50,” or the 50 heroes who stayed at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant until the last moment.

But it is merely the consequences of staff defectionsgoing to the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant against Yoshida’s orderapart from Yoshida’s instructions that 69 workers, including the plant general manager himself, ended up staying at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.

A string of difficult developments erupted at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, where the general manager had no control over his staff workers, 90 percent of whom, including senior employees, had evacuated.

It was learned, first of all, that the site of the explosion was not the No. 2 reactor building, but the No. 4 reactor building, which nobody was on the alert for.

The explosion of the No. 4 reactor building, where regular inspections were under way and nuclear fuel was held in a storage pool, not in the reactor body, alarmed world experts of nuclear reactor structures.

The nuclear fuel storage pool, which is not shielded by a steel container such as a pressure vessel or a containment vessel, could spew radioactive substances directly into the humans’ living environment if the nuclear fuel were to ever melt from its own heat. And the storage pool contained enormous amounts of nuclear fuel.

It was later learned that the nuclear fuel in the No. 4 reactor building’s storage pool had never melted, and the explosion was blamed on a suspected hydrogen inflow from the No. 3 reactor. But a fire was spotted at 9:39 a.m., whereupon alarmed workers tried to use a fire engine, provided by the U.S. military, to extinguish it.

——‘I PLANNED TO RETAIN MINIMUM STAFF FOR WATER INJECTION AND OTHER OPERATIONS. I PLANNED TO STAY MYSELF, TOO.’

The No. 2 reactor did not remain under control. At 8:25 a.m., workers spotted white smoke rising from the No. 2 reactor building. They saw steam at 8:45 a.m.

It was confirmed at 9:45 a.m. that vast volumes of white steam were gushing out of an open blow-out panel attached to a wall of the reactor building. A voluminous mist was spotted in the reactor building at 10:51 a.m., with reported radiation levels of 150-300 millisieverts per hour in the reactor building.

White mists, steam and white smoke had also been spotted some time before the No. 1 and No. 3 reactor buildings exploded. TEPCO was, therefore, on the highest alert for those events, which it took for signs of gas leakage from a nuclear reactor containment vessel.

Radiation level readings near the main gate on the west side of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant rose from 73.2-583.7 microsieverts per hour between 6 a.m. and 7 a.m., around the time the explosive sound was heard, to 234.7-1,390 microsieverts per hour between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m., around the time 90 percent of the staff evacuated to the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant. The readings rose to 8,217 microsieverts per hour at 8:31 a.m., when workers were panicking over the finding that the No. 4 reactor building was the site of the explosion, and to 11,930 microsieverts per hour, more than at any other time during the crisis, at 9 a.m. sharp.

Fukushima nuclear crisis: major events, radiation levels per hour near main gate to Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant

Fukushima nuclear crisis: major events, radiation levels per hour near main gate to Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant

Yoshida appeared to accept to a certain extent that his subordinates believed going to the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant was the right thing to do. But a comparison of time variations in the radiation levels and the emergence of the white smoke and steam from the No. 2 reactor building indicates that the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant was facing a really critical phase when hardly any work could be done properly because so many staff workers had withdrawn totaken shelter at the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant against their plant general manager’s order.

It is embarrassing that tThe government investigation panel, namely the government, which interviewed Yoshida over more than 28 hours, knew but never mentioneddid not mention in its report that evacuationsby many staff workers were taking place against an order during those critical moments.

TEPCO officials said the staff workers, who had withdrawn to the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant, returned only around noon.

While it is true that 69 workers, including Yoshida, never took flight, it remains to be seen if those 69 workers were enough to cope properly with the multiple disaster that was befalling four reactors simultaneously. That question remains open because the government investigation panel and TEPCO have disclosed very little information.

And on March 15, 2011, the day when all this was taking place, the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant spewed radioactive substances to the northwest, in the direction of Namie and Iitate, both in Fukushima Prefecture, at levels that were higher than at any other time and in land areas during the nuclear crisis and forced many residents there to evacuate their communities.

To be followed by Chapter 1, Section 2: “The hardest part to remember”